A strong relationship between the Board and the Executive Director (ED) is the backbone of a thriving nonprofit or association. When the partnership works well, organizations are more effective, leadership is empowered, and strategic goals are met with clarity and purpose. However, when the relationship is strained—whether due to unclear expectations, micromanagement, or lack of communication—the entire organization suffers.
So, what does a strong Board-ED relationship look like? And what should it look like?
What It Looks Like (All Too Often)
In many organizations, the Board-ED relationship falls into one of the following pitfalls:
The Overstepping Board – Some boards get too involved in day-to-day operations, micromanaging the ED rather than focusing on governance and strategy. This creates frustration and undermines the ED's authority.
The Hands-Off Board – At the other extreme, some boards disengage, failing to provide direction or accountability, leaving the ED to operate in a vacuum without meaningful support or oversight.
Unclear Expectations – Without a clear strategic plan, ED's often struggle with shifting priorities and differing opinions from board members, leading to inefficiency and frustration.
Lack of Trust and Respect – When there’s friction between the board and ED, it often stems from a breakdown in trust, lack of transparency, or disrespect for the executive’s expertise.
What It Should Look Like
A high-functioning Board-ED relationship is defined by clarity, accountability, and mutual respect. Here’s what it should look like:
The Board Supports the ED – The Board should serve as a thought partner and resource, not an obstacle. This includes equipping the ED with the tools, training, and strategic direction needed to succeed.
Clear Expectations, Grounded in a Strategic Plan – The Board must provide a well-defined strategic plan, ensuring the ED knows the long-term vision, priorities, and key performance indicators (KPIs). Expectations should not shift unpredictably or be subject to board member whims.
Respect for Roles – The Board governs; the ED manages/leads. When each party stays in their lane—while maintaining open communication—organizations thrive.
Accountability Without Micromanagement – The Board should hold the ED accountable for results, not process. This means assessing performance based on agreed-upon strategic goals rather than personal preferences on operational details.
Regular, Meaningful Communication – Strong relationships require ongoing dialogue. Board members and the ED should engage in regular, structured conversations—not just at quarterly meetings—to discuss progress, challenges, and strategic priorities.
A Culture of Trust and Partnership – The most successful nonprofits and associations cultivate an environment where the Board and ED view each other as allies working toward a shared mission. Disagreements happen, but mutual respect and professionalism must always guide interactions.
How to Strengthen the Board-ED Relationship
If an organization is struggling with its Board-ED dynamic, here are some practical steps to course-correct:
Clarify the Board’s Role – Provide board training to ensure members understand governance vs. management and their role in setting vision rather than handling daily operations.
Revisit the Strategic Plan – If expectations feel unclear, revisit the strategic plan to ensure both the Board and ED are aligned on priorities.
Improve Communication Channels – Schedule regular, structured check-ins between the Board President and ED, ensuring open and honest dialogue.
Conduct Regular Performance Evaluations – The Board should provide constructive feedback on the ED’s performance based on measurable goals, not personal opinions.
Foster a Culture of Collaboration – Encourage Board members and the ED to view themselves as strategic partners working toward a common mission.
A strong Board-ED relationship is not just about avoiding conflict—it’s about creating a high-functioning leadership team that drives impact. When the Board provides clear expectations, supports rather than undermines, and holds the ED accountable with respect and professionalism, nonprofits and associations are positioned for success.
What are your thoughts? Have you seen examples of effective Board-ED relationships? Let’s continue the conversation.
Comments